<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Can a VFO from a heathkit Hw-101 be put in an Hw-100?</title>
	<link>http://audiograveyard.info/uncategorized/can-a-vfo-from-a-heathkit-hw-101-be-put-in-an-hw-100</link>
	<description>All About vintage pro audio</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 13:40:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Charley128</title>
		<link>http://audiograveyard.info/uncategorized/can-a-vfo-from-a-heathkit-hw-101-be-put-in-an-hw-100#comment-385</link>
		<author>Charley128</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 21:33:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://audiograveyard.info/uncategorized/can-a-vfo-from-a-heathkit-hw-101-be-put-in-an-hw-100#comment-385</guid>
		<description>Now it's been a long time since I've seen the two units. But as I recall the only difference between them was the dial drive unit.
Electronically they were the same as far as voltage and frequency were concerned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now it&#8217;s been a long time since I&#8217;ve seen the two units. But as I recall the only difference between them was the dial drive unit.<br />
Electronically they were the same as far as voltage and frequency were concerned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

